|
|
|
|
|
Over the last two decades NCSPP has played a crucial role in
changing the nature of training in Professional Psychology. NCSPP was
created in response to the seemingly obvious need for Professional Psychologists
to receive training in psychotherapy and assessment, rather than solely
research, if they planned to assess
and treat clients. NCSPP went on to lead the movements toward incorporating
diversity training into the curriculum, toward identifying the competencies
required of professional psychologists, and most recently, toward
recognizing the importance of advocacy training for our clients and our
profession. The 2003 conference of the National Council of Schools and
Programs of Professional Psychology (NCSPP) focused on the ways in which
NCSPP can continue to shape the future of professional psychology through
education, training, research, service, and advocacy. The following are
“action steps” produced by the small discussion groups at the 2003 NCSPP
conference in Scottsdale Arizona. |
|
|
|
|
|
Examine assumptions about education and
training, taking into consideration new ethics code. |
|
Lobby relevant bodies to help make the changes |
|
Develop ways to provide socialization
experiences that: |
|
are grounded in the history of the NCSPP model |
|
Facilitate conscious self-reflection |
|
Develop self-awareness, including beliefs and
values |
|
Are responsive to society and the challenges
that psychology is facing. |
|
Allow for a healthy, balanced life for both
students and faculty. |
|
Encourage participation in the political process |
|
Help students find their niches |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a clearing house for diversity materials to
the web site. |
|
Develop advocacy strategies for
extending/increasing services to diverse groups. |
|
Articulate and operationalize the new diversity
competency. |
|
Develop models for inservice training/dialogue
for our own faculty, adjunct faculty, supervisors, etc. |
|
|
|
|
In its documents, writings, and practice, NCSPP
schools and programs should reemphasize attitudes and values (the “A” of
the “KSAs”) in discussion of competencies |
|
NCSPP should develop a conference and writings
on the importance of general identity formation for psychologists, which
includes the competencies but reiterates the importance of social
responsibility. This would involve
encouraging and maintaining a larger and broader integrative vision of
competencies. |
|
NCSPP should examine the developmental elements
of competencies, which include pedagogy and assessment. Beyond individual supervisors, action in
this area depends on the collegiality and is the joint responsibility of
the faculty and the broader professional community. |
|
|
|
|
Keeping in mind that it is difficult to assess
quality (vs. quantity) and recognizing that skills and attitudes are more
difficult to assess than knowledge, NCSPP should gather “best practices” as
well as different tools used by programs to teach and assess competencies
as well as the overall process of “becoming a psychologist.” |
|
We should explore the issues that arise in the
evaluating “challenging” students in the context of competencies. |
|
We should be vigilant and advocate for
appropriate implementation of the NCSPP competency module, accreditation,
and other arenas to assure that it is not implemented in a trivial or
oversimplified manner. |
|
|
|
|
Post pedagogic innovations on web site. |
|
Hold regular sessions on pedagogy at NCSPP
conferences. |
|
Develop pedagogy task force through education
and training committee |
|
Create Executive Committee position related to
pedagogy to make sure that effective pedagogy receives sufficient
attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protect our freedom to innovate – develop
credibility for our models with or without accreditation. |
|
Nominate and develop candidates for CoA from
NCSPP and for APA president who will protect our freedom to innovate. |
|
Identify and disseminate best practices. |
|
Provide information via the web regarding best
practices and also share forms, outcome measures, etc., via the web. |
|
Compile relevant data across programs. |
|
Develop manuals for “consortiums” based on
above. |
|
Develop listserv and task force to discuss
practicum and internship issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set formal meeting times in which to to discuss
issues related to administering programs. |
|
Sessions would provide: |
|
Facilitators to engage group |
|
Consultation with colleagues |
|
Training in specific management areas |
|
Overall support |
|
|
|
|
Maintain visibility of the topic in NCSPP and
education of members regarding the breadth of the topic and possible
applications in programs- traditional as well as distance education |
|
Gather data on who’s doing what, how, how much,
and when; including creation of an interest group |
|
Possible use of Distance Education as delivery
mechanism for offering course between NCSPP meetings - someone suggested a
course on history, policies, competencies, etc. |
|
Create a place on the web site for Distance
Education methods, innovations, and resources to be accumulated and made
available to the membership. |
|
Recommend that NCSPP have a live demonstration
of on-line, distributed learning either over a period of time between
meetings or at one of the annual meetings. NCSPP give consideration to what
aspects of the core curriculum could effectively be delivered using
Distance Education models. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCSPP should acknowledge that psychopharmacology
is an important part of the bio-psycho-social approach of professional
psychology. |
|
NCSPP curriculum should emphasize a
psychological model of psychotherapy, which uses medication in conjunction
with psychotherapy. |
|
NCSPP should consider a curriculum model that
includes: |
|
A psychopharmacology course |
|
Biological bases courses with a clinical focus |
|
Psychopharmacology information in related
courses |
|
|
|
|
Help to expand our economic database (recognize
the potential ramifications for other disciplines as we move in this
direction). |
|
Find ways to fund preceptors and incorporate
supervision into the teaching load of faculty. |
|
Infuse psychology students into treatment teams
(resolve charting, privileging, and billing issues). |
|
Advocacy: Insure federal mandate to have mental
health as part of community mental health centers. Help graduates obtain
jobs in this area. |
|
Infuse information about primary health care
into curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCSPP members should advocate for support of
education in psychology. |
|
NCSPP members should become more savvy about
funding opportunities. |
|
NCSPP should support member schools seeking
funding by: |
|
Developing a mechanism for sharing information
on federal and local grants. |
|
Developing a resource bank of people to help
other schools obtain grants. |
|
Holding workshops on grant writing. |
|
Drawing attention to web-based grant resources |
|
|
|
|
Over the next several weeks, summaries of the discussions producing
these action steps will be circulated. These will remind participants of
the contexts and discussions from which the action steps emerged. The next
step is to move some of these initiatives forward. Several individuals have
already stepped toward to serve as
“guardians” for particular action steps. In this capacity, they will
usher the ideas through NCSPP channels and bring them to fruition. If you
feel that a particular action step is critical to the future of
Professional Psychology, we encourage you to do the same, so that NCSPP
will continue to play an active, dynamic role in shaping the future of
professional psychology through education, training, research, service, and
advocacy. |
|